Denial of Justice: Constitutional Breakdown in Ireland

One of the Worst Miscarriages of Justice in European Legal History

Case of Peter Ivan Dunne — filed before the High Court of Justice (UK) and the High Court of Ireland, invoking the Constitution of Ireland, the Human Rights Act 1998 (UK), and the European Convention on Human Rights.

Summary

Peter Ivan Dunne has filed a dual-jurisdiction application for extraordinary relief, damages, and annulment of multiple judgments — arguing that his case represents one of the gravest miscarriages of justice in European legal history.

Over two decades, state authorities have systematically destroyed every aspect of his family life, leaving him entirely estranged from all relatives — Irish, British, Jamaican, Malaysian, and Singaporean alike — through direct state action and judicial complicity.

Legal Firsts

• The first known case where a litigant in person has handled an interlinked dual-jurisdiction filing between two High Courts without legal counsel.
• The first time a single applicant has demonstrated five warrants and six judgments of an extradition case to be void on their face.
• The first instance of two family law and one magistrates’ court actions proven void ab initio and ultra vires, across both UK and Irish jurisdictions.

Key Issues

• Unlawful extradition in breach of the rule of speciality
• Void criminal and family court judgments based on falsified records
• Judicial complicity and cross-border coordination between UK and Irish authorities
• Over 5,000 religious rights violations (denial of kosher food in prison)
• Total destruction of family life, violating Article 8 ECHR
• Homelessness, destitution, and denial of legal representation
• Cross-jurisdictional abuses amounting to inhuman and degrading treatment under Articles 2 & 3 ECHR

Torture and Cumulative Abuses

In 2003, Ireland knowingly proceeded against the wrong person, fabricating a non-existent victim to secure extradition. Exculpatory DNA and custody evidence were suppressed in both 2003 and 2008 to maintain these unlawful actions. The UK and Irish police have continued to withhold records up to 2025, with Ireland still refusing disclosure.

The consequences include:

• Destruction of the relationship with his son (2003)
• Destruction of his engagement (2005)
• Injuries from a terrorist attack (10 October 2005) causing permanent neurological damage
• Rape and denial of kosher food in custody (2003–2013)
• Collapse of remaining family ties (2013–2025)
• Complete career and reputation destruction

Legal Basis

The filings seek:

• Quashing of all unlawful judgments as void ab initio
• Recognition of systemic judicial misconduct and state collusion
• Whole-life compensation for loss of liberty, family, and livelihood
• Joint obligation of Ireland and the UK to restore rights and remedy breaches

Why This Matters

This case raises profound questions of democratic accountability:

• Can judges engage in perjury or cross-border collusion without consequence?
• Can two European states conspire to deny a citizen their rights for over twenty years?
• If these violations stand, what protections remain for others?

As both a British and Irish national and a member of the Jewish faith, Mr Dunne has also challenged Ireland’s recognition of Palestine — identifying systemic antisemitism within his treatment and its broader political implications.

Applicant Background & Achievements

Mr Dunne is a highly accomplished engineer, scientist, and programmer whose future in advanced research was destroyed by the unlawful actions of the state.

His professional work includes:

• Five new types of compressor and two continuous burn engines
• High-efficiency energy recovery and expansion control systems
• Advanced power supply and bio-sensor technologies
• Multiple sophisticated software and AI developments

His résumé and supporting technical evidence are available in the High Court filing.

Contact

📧 Email: cutout.p.dunne@gmail.com
📱 WhatsApp / Signal: +385 98 951 3047